The reference to history and its undenıable role in inference is obvıous. However, there have always been some creators on the high horizon, who came through the stairs of criticizing history and historical understanding of scientific issues. What has been central to these forethoughts is whether the issues and discourses around a subject have been the same throughout history, and how and why did the previous discourse emerge, and what was its relation to the current discourse? These important questions about science and human knowledge have led to a detailed understanding of history and have provided good deductive tools for understanding history and then historical criticism of science. One of these tools is scientific genealogy with the specific meaning of this paper.
Given that in jurisprudence and principles as two human sciences other than laws and sharia, these questions and instruments of genealogy are applicable, to the quality of the historical interpretation of jurisprudence and principles and some of their issues by means of genealogy and we have discussed Amin Estrabadi's perspective.
In the meantime, the paper has concluded that neglecting the history of the issue and analyzing the jurisprudential issues and their principles is fundamentally irrelevant and irrelevant. Accordingly, issues such as the definition of jurisprudence, the legitimacy of imitation, but also the basis of authority and the position of reasoning and reasoning of the principles of jurisprudence are being criticized. Finally, it is necessary to pay attention to the historical interpretation and its usefulness in critiquing and emphasizing the scientific roadmap of the disciplines.